
Capital Update May 29, 2026
“The agreed-upon State Budget is a mixed bag for our patients and New York’s healthcare system. Importantly, it takes a number of positive steps, including greater transparency of excessive and burdensome health insurance prior authorization requirements that impact our patients’ ability to receive the care they need, ensures for another year full coverage for New York’s Excess Medical Malpractice Insurance program to help mitigate New York’s outrageous liability cost burden for physicians, continues funding for the essential services provided by the Committee for Physicians’ Health, and continues fair insurer payment for delivering healthcare services via telehealth.
“However, we are very concerned about the impact to our state’s hospital emergency departments due to the significant changes to the dispute resolution mechanism that will make it extremely difficult to challenge pervasive health insurer underpayments that could very well deter many specialist physicians from being available on-call to provide immediately needed care to patients. Moreover, we are disappointed that the final package designed to increase physician participation in the Workers’ Compensation system did not include meaningful provisions to address carrier delays in payments for care to injured workers that are the REAL reason physicians are deterred from participating in Workers Comp.
“We look forward to our continued discussions with policymakers to address challenges faced by our patients in obtaining needed care across the State, including finding solutions to address the litany of practice challenges that causes New York to continue to be ranked as one of the worst states in the country to be a physician.”
Fifty-seven days after it was due, the New York State Legislature and Governor completed passage of its $268.5 Billion State Budget for 2026-27. This year was a particularly challenging year given the extraordinary volume of issues impacting physician-delivered care in this year’s Budget discussions.
The final Budget included some prior authorization forms, new Medicaid funding for the physician fee schedule, and a rejection of several adverse proposals opposed by MSSNY. However, it also contained profound changes to New York’s surprise bill law particularly as it relates to publicly funded health plans, despite repeated warnings from MSSNY and other groups regarding the impact of such a step on hospital emergency departments across the State that rely upon on-call specialty physician care.
Positive outcomes in the Budget included:
- Rejection of the proposal opposed by MSSNY to require physicians to bear 50% of the cost of the Excess Medical Malpractice Insurance coverage, saving physicians nearly $40 million.
- Rejection of the proposal opposed by MSSNY to enable many Physician Assistants to practice without physician supervision.
- Rejection of the proposal opposed by MSSNY to reduce the pass-through entity tax credit used by many private physician practices
- Prior authorization reforms supported by MSSNY:
- Increased health plan reporting on pre-authorization requests approved and denied, including the 25 most frequent CPT codes where a pre-auth was requested, and the 25 most frequent CPT codes where a pre-auth was denied.
- Ensuring 90 days of continued coverage for a course of treatment by a non-par physician when the patient enters a new health plan.
- Greater health insurance transparency of their prescription formularies, which must be available on health plan websites without having to establish an account or password.
- Prohibiting prior authorization more than once per year for an outpatient course of treatment for a chronic health condition starting from the date of a pre-authorization approval for the course of treatment unless the enrollee’s attending provider recommends a change to the course of treatment.
- Continuation of Requirement for Health Insurers to ensure telehealth payment parity.
- Allocation of $50 million in new funding for the Medicaid physician fee schedule.
- Funding MSSNY’s Committee for Physicians’ Health program at $990,000 historical level.
- Funding Doctors’ Across New York medical student loan repayment program funded again at $15,865,000 historical level.
- New funding for the MSSNY/NYSPA/NASW Veterans’ Mental Health Training Initiative.
- Reducing prior authorization requirements in Workers’ Compensation by increasing cost of care threshold from $1,000 to $1,500.
Profound Changes to IDR Will Impact Hospital Emergency Departments. Despite the pervasive opposition from MSSNY and many other allies, through in the Capitol/LOB, in district, grassroots and media advocacy, the State Budget includes a comprehensive component significantly reducing access to and awards from New York’s Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process. The new provisions do not change current statutory IDR criteria for out of network disputes involving state-regulated commercial plan enrollees. HOWEVER, the new provisions greatly limit physician appeal rights by:
Removing Medicaid Managed Care out of network claim disputes entirely from IDR. Became effective upon Governor’s signing on May 28.
Bringing NYSHIP/Empire Plan into state IDR but under a different decisional standard. Disputes involving out of network NYSHIP claims will be decided by proximity to a 50th-percentile “allowed benchmark” rather than the existing statutory criteria, and IDR awards involving NYSHIP are capped at an 80th-percentile allowed benchmark defined as “maximum fee.” Becomes effective 90 days after signing – August 25th.
Establishing situations where IDR will not be available as a remedy regardless of insurance coverage:
-
- if the health plan can demonstrate that it has a contract with the provider or a subsidiary or other entity owned or operated by the provider that is in effect at the time the disputed service or services were provided to provide the same service or services at the same location; or
- If the health care plan can demonstrate that a notice of determination for prior authorization has been issued to the patient’s health care provider that includes necessary legal disclosures and clearly identifies the health care service or services in dispute as out-of-network.
Workers Compensation Changes Fail to Address Root Cause of What Deters Physicians from Program. Establishing a “universal approval” system for physicians to participate in the Workers Compensation program, which eliminates the long-standing requirement for a physician’s initial application to include a recommendation from the county medical society where the physician practices. While lauding the intent to increase physician participation in the WC program, MSSNY and county medical societies across the State raised serious concerns because, in addition to eliminating an important credentialing process applicable with other forms of insurance, the Budget measure does very little to address the litany of claims administration and payment hassles that currently and will continue to deter physicians from participating in the WC program. The changes will take effect January 1, 2028.
We thank all the physicians and county society leaders who took the time to make a phone call, send a letter or tweet, and/or come to Albany to advocate on all these items on behalf of their colleagues and patients.
MSSNY continues in its advocacy efforts in the Legislative Session’s final days to strengthen protections for physicians facing arbitrary insurer contract non-renewals. Following extensive negotiations, legislation to provide an opportunity to challenge these non-renewal determinations (S.1911 C/A.8052 B) was amended this week and remains on the floor in both Houses.
The latest version of this bill would require:
- Health plans to provide written notice of nonrenewal that includes a clear explanation of the determination, with specific reasons for the decision.
- The notice of non-renewal to include instructions on how the physician may submit information in response to the stated reasons.
- The notice of non-renewal to include instructions regarding the process for requesting reconsideration of the determination by the health plan.
Please remain alert for further updates on this legislation.
Assembly Committees Advance Chiropractic Scope Legislation Opposed by Several Physician Associations
Physicians must continue to contact their legislators to oppose legislation (A4706C/S5860C) that significantly expands the scope of services that could be provided by a chiropractor. The bill presents significant patient safety risks due to its numerous vague provisions, failure to identify appropriate educational standards for ensuring the expanded services can be provided safely, and expanding authorization to conduct detailed diagnostic testing without a defined pathway for treating conditions identified through these tests.
The bill has advanced from the Assembly Higher Education Committee to the Ways & Means Committee. The Senate same-as is currently in the Senate Higher Education Committee but could advance at any time given that the Senate passed a different version of the legislation in the Session’s final days last year. In addition to MSSNY, the bill is opposed by the New York State Society of Orthopedic Surgeons, the New York State Neurological Society, the American Association of Neuromuscular & Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Medical Association. Specifically, the groups’ concerns with this legislation include:
- Expanding chiropractic authority beyond the vertebral column to include “other articular segments” and the broad treatment of neuromusculoskeletal conditions without adequate training. Orthopedic surgeons possess years of specialty training including 4 years of medical school, a 5-year residency, all specifically directed at diagnosing and managing pathology of the extremities. By comparison, the standard chiropractic doctoral program has no mandatory post-graduate residency of comparable depth, does not provide equivalent preparation to evaluate and manage structural joint pathology, ligamentous injury, tendon avulsion, articular fracture, or complex instability patterns.
- Authorizing chiropractors to perform and interpret electrodiagnostic tests, subject only to departmental approval of vague and unspecified “appropriate education standards.” Electrodiagnostic findings may reveal diagnoses that carry significant implications entirely beyond chiropractic scope. The bill provides no advanced training specific to electrodiagnosis, no competency examination, no mandatory referral obligation, no minimum supervised case volume requirement, and no competency standard. Permitting chiropractors to independently conduct these procedures risks missed diagnoses, delayed treatment of serious neurologic disease, and unnecessary or inappropriate care.
- Authorizing chiropractors to order clinical laboratory testing, including methods assessing nutritional and metabolic factors that impact musculoskeletal health, subject to departmental approval. Granting laboratory ordering authority without demonstrating minimal competency or a corresponding framework for managing abnormal results creates a diagnostic gap with potential patient harm consequences.
- Fails to identify steps to ensure that chiropractors possess reliably uniform competency for these expanded services. This legislation contains no provision distinguishing practitioners who have pursued rigorous post-graduate training from those who have not, no requirement that expanded diagnostic authority be conditioned on demonstrated specialty competency, and no mechanism for the public or referring providers to ascertain the educational pedigree of the chiropractor performing an electrodiagnostic study or ordering a metabolic laboratory panel.
- Defers critical competency determinations to the NYS Department of Education. If a patient is harmed due to a misinterpreted EMG or an unrecognized laboratory finding, the statutory standard is so vague as to provide little meaningful recourse framework.
Again, physicians are urged to contact their legislators to oppose this legislation.


